DOI: https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.2015.012

On Redundancy in Describing Linguistic Systems

Vladimir Borissov Pericliev

Abstract


On Redundancy in Describing Linguistic Systems

The notion of system of linguistic elements figures prominently in most post-Saussurian linguistics up to the present. A “system” is the network of the contrastive (or, distinctive) features each element in the system bears to the remaining elements. The meaning (valeur) of each element in the system is the set of features that are necessary and jointly sufficient to distinguish this element from all others. The paper addresses the problems of “redundancy”, i.e. the occurrence of features that are not strictly necessary in describing an element in a system. Redundancy is shown to smuggle into the description of linguistic systems, this infelicitous practice illustrated with some examples from the literature (e.g. the classical phonemic analysis of Russian by Cherry, Halle, and Jakobson, 1953). The logic and psychology of the occurrence of redundancy are briefly sketched and it is shown that, in addition to some other problems, redundancy leads to a huge and unresolvable ambiguity of descriptions of linguistic systems (the Buridan’s ass problem).


Keywords


redundancy; phonological and semantic systems; redundancy and ambiguity

Full Text:

PDF (in English)

References


Burling, R. (1964). Cognition and componential analysis: God's truth or hocus-pocus? American Anthropologist, 66(1), 20-28. http://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.1.02a00020

Cherry, E. C., Halle, M., & Jakobson, R. (1953). Toward the logical description of languages in their phonemic aspect. Language, 29(1), 34-47. http://doi.org/10.2307/410451

Noricks, J. S. (1987). Testing for cognitive validity: Componential analysis and the question of extensions. American Anthropologist, 89(2), 424-438. http://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1987.89.2.02a00110

Pericliev, V. (2012a). Formulating and misformulating language universals. Folia Linguistica, 46(1), 211-232. http://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2012.7

Pericliev, V. (2012b). Machine componential analysis of Bulgarian kinship terminology and more on the problem of multiple solutions. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives, 12, 231-251.

Pericliev, V. (2013). Componential analysis of kinship terminology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137031181

Saussure, F. de (1996). Course in general linguistics. (C. Bally & A. Sechehaye (with A. Riedlinger), Eds., R. Harris, Trans.). Chicago: Open Court. (First published 1916)

Spencer, A. (1996). Phonology: Theory and description. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.




Copyright (c) 2015 Vladimir Borissov Pericliev

License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/