Sovereignty issues in the Caucasus: contested ethnic and national identities in Chechnya, Abkhazia, and South Ossetia

Vasili Rukhadze, Glen Duerr


Sovereignty issues in the Caucasus: contested ethnic and national identities in Chechnya, Abkhazia, and South Ossetia

The issue of sovereignty has been at the forefront of regional politics in the Caucasus since the dissolution of the USSR in 1991. In particular, the Russian government has approached various—seemingly similar cases—in very different ways. Although each specific region examined—Chechnya, Abkhazia, and South Ossetia—is unique, the nature of ethnic and national identity has been framed differently by the Russian government. In Chechnya, the Putin administration has framed any outstanding separatist claims in conjunction with terrorism and national security issues. In Abkhazia and South Ossetia, the Putin administration has instead noted the need for “liberation.” The outcome has been to stifle secessionist desires in Chechnya, while supporting those same secessionist desires outside of Russia’s borders, in Abkhazia and South Ossetia.


Kwestia suwerenności na Kaukazie: kontestowane tożsamości etniczne i narodowe w Czeczenii, Abchazji i Osetii Południowej

Kwestia suwerenności wysunęła się na czołowe miejsce w polityce regionalnej na Kaukazie z chwilą rozpadu Związku Sowieckiego w 1991 roku. W istocie rząd rosyjski do poszczególnych, pozornie podobnych, przypadków podszedł w odmienny sposób. Aczkolwiek każdy z interesujących nas tutaj regionów – Czeczenia, Abchazja i Osetia Południowa – jest unikatowy, to charakter tożsamości etnicznej i narodowej został ujęty przez rząd rosyjski w inne ramy. W Czeczenii administracja Putina wiązała wysuwane tam roszczenia separatystyczne z terroryzmem i kwestiami bezpieczeństwa narodowego. Z kolei w Abchazji i Osetii Południowej Rosja dostrzegła potrzebę „wyzwolenia”. W efekcie nastąpiło stłumienie aspiracji do secesji w Czeczenii, podczas gdy poza granicami Rosji, w Abchazji i Osetii Południowej, te same dążenia secesjonistyczne zyskały sobie poparcie.


Chechnya; Abkhazia; South Ossetia; secession; terrorism

Full Text:

PDF (in English)


Akhmadov, I., & Lanskoy, M. (2010). Chechen struggle: Independence won and lost. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Artman, V. (2014, March 14). Annexation by passport. Aljazeera. Retrieved 2 April 2016, from

Asmus, R. (2010). A little war that shook the world: Georgia, Russia, and the future of the West. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bartkus, V. O. (1999). The dynamics of secession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Beissinger, M. (2002). Nationalist mobilization and the collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Berman, I. (2013). Implosion: The end of Russia and what it means for America. Washington D.C.: Regnery Publishing.

Bird, R., Vaillancourt, F., & Roy-Cesar, E. (2010). Is decentralization "glue" or "solvent" for national unity? Georgia State University. (International Working Paper series)

Buchanan, A. (1991). Secession: The morality of political divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. Boulder: Westview Press.

Buchheit, L. (1978). Secession: The legitimacy of self-determination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Campana, A., & Légaré, K. (2010). Russia’s counterterrorism operation in Chechnya: Institutional competition and issue frames. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 34(1), 47–63.

Civil Georgia. (2010). Georgia pulls out troops, hands over key positions in South Ossetia. Retrieved 2 April 2016, from

Daushvili, A. (2008). Rusuli kolonializmis tsinaaghmdeg brdzola XX saukunis meore nakhevarshi [The struggle against the Russian colonialism in the second half of the 20th century]. In A. Bendianishvili, A. Daushvili, M. Samsonadze, K. Qoqrashvili, D. Chumburidze, & O. Janelidze (Eds.), Rusuli kolonializmi saqartveloshi [Russian colonialism in Georgia] (pp. 449–485). Tbilisi: Universali.

De Waal, T. (2010). The Caucasus: An introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

Dion, S. (1996). Why is secession difficult in well-established democracies?: Lessons from Quebec. British Journal of Political Science, 26(2), 269–283.

Georgia: Shevardnadze discusses 1992 South Ossetia agreement. (2006, February 23). RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Retrieved 9 May 2015, from

Giuliano, E. (2006). Secessionists from the bottom up: Democratization, nationalism, and local accountability in the Russian transition. World Politics, 58(2), 276–310.

Gordon, M. (1999, September 18). Another bombing kills 18 in Russia. The New York Times. Retrieved 2 April 2016, from

Ignatieff, M. (2000). Virtual war: Kosovo and beyond. Toronto: Viking Press.

Independent international fact-finding mission on the conflict in Georgia. (2009, September). Retrieved 13 April 2015, from

International Crisis Group. (2007). Georgia’s South Ossetia conflict: Make hassle slowly. Europe Report N° 183 - 7 June 2007. Retrieved from

Kaufman, S. (2001). Modern hatreds: The symbolic politics of ethnic war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Litvinenko, A., & Felshtinsky, Y. (2007). Blowing up Russia: The secret plot to bring back KGB terror. New York: Encounter Books.

Moore, M. (Ed.). (1998). National self-determination and secession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nolan, C. (2002). The Greenwood encyclopedia of international relations. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishers.

Pokalova, E. (2010). Framing separatism as terrorism: Lessons from Kosovo. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 33(5), 429–447.

Renan, E. (1990). What is a nation? Nation and Narration, (11), 8–22. (First published 1882)

Sakwa, R. (2005). Introduction: Why Chechnya? In R. Sakwa (Ed.), Chechnya: From past to future (pp. 1–20). London: Anthem Press.

Satter, D. (2004). Darkness at dawn: The rise of the Russian criminal state. New Haven: Yale University Press.

United Nations Observer Mission in Georgia. (2015). Retrieved 9 May 2015, from

Wood, J. (1981). Secession: A comparative analytical framework. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 14(1), 107–134.

Zürcher, C. (2005). Georgia’s time of troubles, 1989-1993. In B. Coppieters & R. Legvold (Eds.), Statehood and security: Georgia after the Rose Revolution (pp. 83–115). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Copyright (c) 2016 Vasili Rukhadze, Glen Duerr

License URL: