Abstract:
In this article his been analysed features of inflectional nouns III case which denote female nouns, has been learned main factors denoting their morphological paradigms: substantival type of inflection; gender position (definiting with Feminine Gender); identity to category of creatures-persons; creating full paradygms; identity endings of cases: in Nominative Case singular − don’t have ending (“zero ending”), in Genitive Case − -і, in Dative case − -і, in Accusative Case − don’t have ending (“zero ending”), in Instrumental Case − -у (-ю), in Locative Case − -e, in Vocative Case − -e, in Nominative Case plural − -і, in Genitive Case − -ей, in Dative case − -ам (-ям), in Accusative Case − -ей, (* -і), in Instrumental Case − -ами (-ями), in Locative Case − -ах (-ях), in Vocative Case − -і; the main markers: singular Vocative case; plural Genitive and Accusative Case; availability double forms in plural Accusative Case: identical with plural Gender and homonymical with ancient plural form Accusative Case with preposition в (rarely – через, між (поміж), на) in creatures-persons’ names that identify with modern Nominative; ending -е in singular Vocative case; availability double forms in plural Accusative Case; morphological features in words which are connected with inflection, in particular changing soft / hard sound /л'/ – /л/ in singular Vocative Case and in plural Genitive and Accusative Case, labial with labial + /й/, that is /в/ – /вй/ and /ф/ – /фй/ in singular Instrumental Case, also in plural Dative, Instrumental and Locative Case; uniformity of accentical singular and plural paradygms (the same unmoving voice in plural and singular casial forms) – and selecting system of simple paradygmatical classes female names, which are changed such as nouns III case.
